European Journal of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery
Volume 31, Issue 3 , Pages 300-305 , March 2006

Haemodynamic Study Examining the Response of Venous Blood Flow to Electrical Stimulation of the Gastrocnemius Muscle in Patients with Chronic Venous Disease

  • M. Clarke Moloney

      Affiliations

    • Department of Vascular Surgery, The Regional Hospital and St John's Hospital, Limerick, Ireland
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Mary Clarke Moloney, Department of Vascular Surgery, Mid-Western Regional Hospital, Limerick, Ireland.
  • ,
  • G.M. Lyons

      Affiliations

    • Biomedical Electronics Laboratory, Department of Electronic and Computer Engineering, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
  • ,
  • P. Breen

      Affiliations

    • Biomedical Electronics Laboratory, Department of Electronic and Computer Engineering, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
  • ,
  • P.E. Burke

      Affiliations

    • Department of Vascular Surgery, The Regional Hospital and St John's Hospital, Limerick, Ireland
  • ,
  • P.A. Grace

      Affiliations

    • Department of Vascular Surgery, The Regional Hospital and St John's Hospital, Limerick, Ireland

,Accepted 2 August 2005.

References 

  1. Castineira F, Fisher H, Coleman D, Grace PA, Burke P. The Limerick leg-ulcer project. Ir J Med Sci. 1999;168:17–20
  2. Baker LL, McNeal DR, Benton LA, Bowman BR, Waters RL. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation–a practical guide. 3rd ed. Downey, California: Rancho Los Amigos Research and Education Institute; 1993;
  3. Lyons GM, Leane GE, Grace PA. The effect of electrical stimulation of the calf muscle and compression stocking on venous blood flow velocity. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2002;23(6):564–566
  4. Lyons GM, Leane GE, Clarke Moloney M, O'Brien JV, Grace PA. An investigation of the effect of electrode size and electrode location on comfort during stimulation of the gastrocnemius muscle. Med Eng Phys. 2004;26:873–878
  5. Campbell WI, Patterson CC. Quantifying meaningful changes in pain. Anaesthesia. 1998;53:121–125
  6. Price DD, Bush FM, Long S, Harkins SW. A comparison of pain measurement characteristics of mechanical visual analogue and simple numerical rating scales. Pain. 1994;56:217–226
  7. Kelly AM. The minimum clinically significant difference in visual analogie scale pain score does not differ with severity of pain. Emerg Med J. 2001;18:205–207
  8. Sochart DH, Hardinge K. The relationship of foot and ankle movements to venous return in the lower limb. J Bone Joint Surg. 1999;81(4):700–704
  9. Staubesand J, Heisterkamp T, Stege H. Use of duplex sonography to investigate the effect of active and passive movement at the ankle joint for promoting venous return. Clin Anat. 1995;8:96–101
  10. Dix FP, Brooke R, McCollum CN. Venous disease is associated with impaired range of ankle movement. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2003;25:556–561
  11. Barwell JR, Taylor M, Deacon J, Davies C, Whyman MR, Poskitt KR. Ankle motility is a risk factor for healing of chronic venous leg ulcers. Phlebology. 2001;16:38–40
  12. Lyons GM, Sinkjaer T, Burridge JH, Wilcox D. Review of portable FES-based neural orthoses for the correction of drop foot. IEEE Trans on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering. 2002;10(4):260–279
  13. Reed B. The physiology of neuromuscular electrical stimulation. Pediatr Phys Ther. 1997;9:96–102
  14. Kantor G, Alon G, Ho HS. The effects of selected stimulus waveforms on pulse and phase characteristics at sensory and motor thresholds. Phys Ther. 1994;74(10):951–962

PII: S1078-5884(05)00507-1

doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.08.003

European Journal of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery
Volume 31, Issue 3 , Pages 300-305 , March 2006