« Previous
Next »
European Journal of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery
Volume 33, Issue 2
, Pages 172-176
, February 2007
Impact of Study Design on Outcome after Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair. A Comparison between the Randomized Controlled DREAM-trial and the Observational EUROSTAR-registry
References
- . Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and hierarchy of research designs. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1887–1892
- . A comparison of observational studies and randomized, controlled trials. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1878–1886
- . Surgery and the randomised controlled trial: past, present and future. Med J Aust. 1998;169:380–383
- . The Dutch Randomised Endovascular Aneurysm Management (DREAM) trial: background, design and methods. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2002;43:379–384
- . The need for clinical trials of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm stent-graft repair: The EUROSTAR project. J Endovasc Surg. 1997;4:72–77
- A Randomized Trial Comparing Conventional and Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(16):1607–1618
- Two-year outcomes after conventional or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2398–2405
- . Influence of study design on reported mortality and morbidity rates after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Br J Surg. 1998;85:1624–1630
- Reporting standards for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35:1048–1060
PII: S1078-5884(06)00510-7
doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.09.011
« Previous
Next »
European Journal of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery
Volume 33, Issue 2
, Pages 172-176
, February 2007
