European Journal of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery
Volume 33, Issue 6 , Pages 645-651 , June 2007

Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of the Relationship between Hospital Volume and Outcome Following Carotid Endarterectomy

  • P.J.E. Holt

      Affiliations

    • St George's Vascular Institute, 4th floor, St James' Wing, St George's Hospital, London SW17 0QT, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. P.J.E. Holt, St George's Vascular Institute, 4th floor, St James' Wing, St George's Hospital, Tooting, London SW17 0QT, UK.
  • ,
  • J.D. Poloniecki

      Affiliations

    • Community Health Sciences, St George's University of London, London SW17 0QT, UK
  • ,
  • I.M. Loftus

      Affiliations

    • St George's Vascular Institute, 4th floor, St James' Wing, St George's Hospital, London SW17 0QT, UK
  • ,
  • M.M. Thompson

      Affiliations

    • St George's Vascular Institute, 4th floor, St James' Wing, St George's Hospital, London SW17 0QT, UK

,Accepted 21 January 2007.

References 

  1. Group ECSTC . Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet. 1998 May 9;351(9113):1379–1387
  2. Study ECftACA . Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA. 1995 May 10;273(18):1421–1428
  3. Ferguson GG, Eliasziw M, Barr HW, Clagett GP, Barnes RW, Wallace MC, et al. The North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial: surgical results in 1415 patients. Stroke. 1999 Sep;30(9):1751–1758
  4. Rothwell PM. ACST: which subgroups will benefit most from carotid endarterectomy?. Lancet. 2004 Sep 25–Oct 1;364(9440):1122–1123[author reply 5–6]
  5. Rothwell PM, Eliasziw M, Gutnikov SA, Warlow CP, Barnett HJ. Endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis in relation to clinical subgroups and timing of surgery. Lancet. 2004 Mar 20;363(9413):915–924
  6. Wennberg DE, Lucas FL, Birkmeyer JD, Bredenberg CE, Fisher ES. Variation in carotid endarterectomy mortality in the Medicare population: trial hospitals, volume, and patient characteristics. JAMA. 1998 Apr 22–29;279(16):1278–1281
  7. Collaboration C. Revman. [cited 2006 20th December 2006]; Available from: http://www.cc-ims.net/RevMan/ivnotes.htm.
  8. Lewis S, Clarke M. Forest plots: trying to see the wood and the trees. BMJ. 2001 Jun 16;322(7300):1479–1480
  9. Collaboration C. openlearning. [cited 2006 20th December]; Available from: www.cochrane-net.org/openlearning.
  10. Hardy RJ, Thompson SG. Detecting and describing heterogeneity in meta-analysis. Stat Med. 1998 Apr 30;17(8):841–856
  11. Weingart SN, Iezzoni LI, Davis RB, Palmer RH, Cahalane M, Hamel MB, et al. Use of administrative data to find substandard care: validation of the complications screening program. Med Care. 2000 Aug;38(8):796–806
  12. Panayiotopoulos YP, Padayachee S, Colchester AC, Taylor PR. The changing indications for carotid endarterectomy in the UK. Int J Clin Pract. 1997 Sep;51(6):375–377
  13. Kempczinski RF, Brott TG, Labutta RJ. The influence of surgical specialty and caseload on the results of carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg. 1986 Jun;3(6):911–916
  14. Cebul RD, Snow RJ, Pine R, Hertzer NR, Norris DG. Indications, outcomes, and provider volumes for carotid endarterectomy. JAMA. 1998 Apr 22–29;279(16):1282–1287
  15. Middleton S, Donnelly N. Outcomes of carotid endarterectomy: how does the Australian state of New South Wales compare with international benchmarks?. J Vasc Surg. 2002 Jul;36(1):62–69
  16. Pearce WH, Parker MA, Feinglass J, Ujiki M, Manheim LM. The importance of surgeon volume and training in outcomes for vascular surgical procedures. J Vasc Surg. 1999 May;29(5):768–776[discussion 77–78]
  17. Holt PJE, Poloniecki JD, Loftus IM, Gerrard D, Thompson MM. Meta-analysis and systematic review of the relationship between volume and outcome in abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. Br J Surg. 2007;94(4):395–403
  18. Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, Stukel TA, Lucas FL, Batista I, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2002 Apr 11;346(15):1128–1137
  19. Perler BA, Dardik A, Burleyson GP, Gordon TA, Williams GM. Influence of age and hospital volume on the results of carotid endarterectomy: a statewide analysis of 9918 cases. J Vasc Surg. 1998 Jan;27(1):25–31[discussion 3]
  20. Edwards WH, Morris JA, Jenkins JM, Bass SM, MacKenzie EJ. Evaluating quality, cost-effective health care. Vascular database predicated on hospital discharge abstracts. Ann Surg. 1991 May;213(5):433–438[discussion 8–9]
  21. Karp HR, Flanders WD, Shipp CC, Taylor B, Martin D. Carotid endarterectomy among Medicare beneficiaries: a statewide evaluation of appropriateness and outcome. Stroke. 1998 Jan;29(1):46–52
  22. Roddy SP, O'Donnell TF, Wilson AL, Estes JM, Mackey WC. The Balanced Budget Act: potential implications for the practice of vascular surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2000 Feb;31(2):227–236
  23. Dudley RA, Johansen KL, Brand R, Rennie DJ, Milstein A. Selective referral to high-volume hospitals: estimating potentially avoidable deaths. JAMA. 2000 Mar 1;283(9):1159–1166
  24. Dardik A, Bowman HM, Gordon TA, Hsieh G, Perler BA. Impact of race on the outcome of carotid endarterectomy: a population-based analysis of 9,842 recent elective procedures. Ann Surg. 2000 Nov;232(5):704–709
  25. Harthun NL, Kongable GL, Baglioni AJ, Meakem TD, Kron IL. Examination of sex as an independent risk factor for adverse events after carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg. 2005 Feb;41(2):223–230
  26. Segal HE, Rummel L, Wu B. The utility of PRO data on surgical volume: the example of carotid endarterectomy. QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1993 May;19(5):152–157
  27. Cowan JA, Dimick JB, Thompson BG, Stanley JC, Upchurch GR. Surgeon volume as an indicator of outcomes after carotid endarterectomy: an effect independent of specialty practice and hospital volume. J Am Coll Surg. 2002 Dec;195(6):814–821
  28. Manheim LM, Sohn MW, Feinglass J, Ujiki M, Parker MA, Pearce WH. Hospital vascular surgery volume and procedure mortality rates in California, 1982–1994. J Vasc Surg. 1998 Jul;28(1):45–56[discussion 8]
  29. Hannan EL, Popp AJ, Tranmer B, Fuestel P, Waldman J, Shah D. Relationship between provider volume and mortality for carotid endarterectomies in New York state. Stroke. 1998 Nov;29(11):2292–2297
  30. Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W, Hur K, Hossain M, Soybel D, et al. Relation of surgical volume to outcome in eight common operations: results from the VA National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg. 1999 Sep;230(3):414–429[discussion 29–32]
  31. Mayo SW, Eldrup-Jorgensen J, Lucas FL, Wennberg DE, Bredenberg CE. Carotid endarterectomy after NASCET and ACAS: a statewide study. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis Study. J Vasc Surg. 1998 Jun;27(6):1017–1022[discussion 22–3]
  32. Feasby TE, Quan H, Ghali WA. Hospital and surgeon determinants of carotid endarterectomy outcomes. Arch Neurol. 2002 Dec;59(12):1877–1881
  33. Peck C, Peck J, Peck A. Comparison of carotid endarterectomy at high- and low-volume hospitals. Am J Surg. 2001 May;181(5):450–453
  34. Kantonen I, Lepantalo M, Salenius JP, Matzke S, Luther M, Ylonen K. Influence of surgical experience on the results of carotid surgery. The Finnvasc Study Group. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1998 Feb;15(2):155–160
  35. Fisher ES, Malenka DJ, Solomon NA, Bubolz TA, Whaley FS, Wennberg JE. Risk of carotid endarterectomy in the elderly. Am J Public Health. 1989 Dec;79(12):1617–1620

PII: S1078-5884(07)00086-X

doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2007.01.014

European Journal of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery
Volume 33, Issue 6 , Pages 645-651 , June 2007