European Journal of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery
Volume 35, Issue 2 , Pages 162-172 , February 2008

Outcome after Endografting in Small and Large Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A Metanalysis.

  • P. De Rango
    • ,
  • P. Cao

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: P. Cao, MD, FRCS, Professor of Vascular Surgery, University of Perugia, Chief of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Ospedale S. Maria della Misericordia, Loc. S. Andrea delle Fratte, 06156 Perugia, Italy.
    • ,
  • G. Parlani
    • ,
  • F. Verzini
    • ,
  • D. Brambilla

,Accepted 17 October 2007.

  • Image Result

    The odds of perioperative death for small versus large AAA: weighted pooled results by random-effect model of inverse variance method. u/d: unpublished data.

    The odds of perioperative death for small versus large AAA: weighted pooled results by random-effect model of inverse variance method. u/d: unpublished data.

  • Image Result

    The odds of all causes death for small versus large AAA: weighted pooled results with random-effect model of inverse variance method. The odds of all causes death for small versus large AAA are strati

    The odds of all causes death for small versus large AAA: weighted pooled results with random-effect model of inverse variance method. The odds of all causes death for small versus large AAA are stratified by follow-up length. u/d unpublished data.

  • Image Result
    The odds of aneurysm-related death for small versus large AAA: weighted pooled results by random-effect model of inverse variance method. The odds of aneurysm related death for small versus large AAA

    The odds of aneurysm-related death for small versus large AAA: weighted pooled results by random-effect model of inverse variance method. The odds of aneurysm related death for small versus large AAA stratified by follow-up length. u/d unpublished data.

  • Image Result
    The odds of rupture for small versus large AAA: weighted pooled results by random effect model of inverse variance method. The odds of rupture for small versus large AAA are stratified by follow-up le

    The odds of rupture for small versus large AAA: weighted pooled results by random effect model of inverse variance method. The odds of rupture for small versus large AAA are stratified by follow-up length. u/d unpublished data p/u: published and unpublished data.

  • Image Result
    The odds of conversion during follow-up for small versus large AAA (weighted pooled results by random-effect model of inverse variance method). All studies with mean follow-up longer than 24 months. u

    The odds of conversion during follow-up for small versus large AAA (weighted pooled results by random-effect model of inverse variance method). All studies with mean follow-up longer than 24 months. u/d unpublished data; p/u: published and unpublished data.

  • Image Result
    The odds of reintervention during follow-up for small versus large AAA (weighted pooled results by random-effect model of inverse variance method). All studies with mean follow-up longer than 24 month

    The odds of reintervention during follow-up for small versus large AAA (weighted pooled results by random-effect model of inverse variance method). All studies with mean follow-up longer than 24 months. u/d unpublished data; p/d: published and unpublished data.

PII: S1078-5884(07)00676-4

doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2007.10.015

European Journal of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery
Volume 35, Issue 2 , Pages 162-172 , February 2008

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution