European Journal of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery
Volume 35, Issue 4 , Pages 383-391, April 2008

Delay May Reduce Procedural Risk, But at What Price to the Patient?

  • A.R. Naylor

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Professor A. R. Naylor, Dept of Vascular Surgery, Clinical Sciences Building, PO Box 65, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester LE2 7LX, UK.

The Department of Vascular Surgery at Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK

Accepted 9 January 2008. published online 13 February 2008.

The renewed strategy towards performing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) within 1–2 weeks of a patient presenting with a TIA or minor stroke is based on a large body of evidence showing that the highest risk period for the patient is the first seven days after the index event. Unfortunately, most stroke/vascular services are inadequately resourced to achieve this target and many are more likely to be pre-occupied with treating large numbers of asymptomatic individuals. This paper reviews the evidence underlying the current drive towards expedited intervention in patients presenting with TIA and minor stroke. It will also try to provide reassurance to the surgeon as to how such a strategy can be reconciled with understandable concerns that early CEA in symptomatic patients is associated with poorer perioperative outcomes.

Keywords: Stroke, Carotid, Endarterectomy, Angioplasty

 

PII: S1078-5884(08)00010-5

doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2008.01.002

European Journal of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery
Volume 35, Issue 4 , Pages 383-391, April 2008