European Journal of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery
Volume 36, Issue 6 , Pages 668-676 , December 2008

Patient-Specific AAA Wall Stress Analysis: 99-Percentile Versus Peak Stress

  • L. Speelman

      Affiliations

    • Eindhoven University of Technology, Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Netherlands
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. L. Speelman, azM, Department of Biomedical Engineering, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31 43 3876291; fax: +31 43 3874277.
  • ,
  • E.M.H. Bosboom

      Affiliations

    • Maastricht University Medical Center, Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • G.W.H. Schurink

      Affiliations

    • Maastricht University Medical Center, Department of General Surgery, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • F.A.M.V.I. Hellenthal

      Affiliations

    • Maastricht University Medical Center, Department of General Surgery, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • J. Buth

      Affiliations

    • Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Department of Vascular Surgery, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • M. Breeuwer

      Affiliations

    • Philips Medical Center, Department of Clinical and Healthcare Informatics, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • M.J. Jacobs

      Affiliations

    • Maastricht University Medical Center, Department of General Surgery, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • F.N. van de Vosse

      Affiliations

    • Eindhoven University of Technology, Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Netherlands

Received 17 July 2008 ,Accepted 13 September 2008.

  • Image Result

    The 3D active object of the centerline (left), the lumen (middle) and the AAA wall (right).

    The 3D active object of the centerline (left), the lumen (middle) and the AAA wall (right).

  • Image Result

    Left: Failure of the automatic segmentation into the vena cava (thin solid line) and manual corrected contour (solid dotted line). Right: Corrected contour.

    Left: Failure of the automatic segmentation into the vena cava (thin solid line) and manual corrected contour (solid dotted line). Right: Corrected contour.

  • Image Result

    Posterior view of the stress distributions for two patients for operators 1, 2 and 3.

    Posterior view of the stress distributions for two patients for operators 1, 2 and 3.

  • Image Result

    The mean and standard deviation of the peak stress and 99-percentile stress for the 5 analyses of all patients as determined by operator 1 (left) and 2 (right).

    The mean and standard deviation of the peak stress and 99-percentile stress for the 5 analyses of all patients as determined by operator 1 (left) and 2 (right).

  • Image Result

    Bland–Altman plots for operators 1, 2 and 3 (- - indicates one standard deviation).

    Bland–Altman plots for operators 1, 2 and 3 (- - indicates one standard deviation).

  • Image Result

    Linear regression between the 99-percentile stress and the maximum diameter (left, - - indicates one standard deviation) and the residuals of the regression model, normalized to the standard deviation

    Linear regression between the 99-percentile stress and the maximum diameter (left, - - indicates one standard deviation) and the residuals of the regression model, normalized to the standard deviation of the residuals (right).

  • Image Result
    A–E ‘high stress AAAs’ with stresses more than one standard deviation above the regression model. F–I ‘low stress AAAs’ with stresses below the regression model.

    A–E ‘high stress AAAs’ with stresses more than one standard deviation above the regression model. F–I ‘low stress AAAs’ with stresses below the regression model.

PII: S1078-5884(08)00488-7

doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2008.09.007

European Journal of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery
Volume 36, Issue 6 , Pages 668-676 , December 2008