European Journal of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery
Volume 38, Issue 3 , Pages 255-261, September 2009

Endovascular Aortic Arch Repair: Hopes and Certainties

  • M. Schoder

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
    • ,
  • J. Lammer

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
    • ,
  • M. Czerny

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Austria

Received 11 June 2009; accepted 11 June 2009. published online 13 July 2009.

Article Outline

Abstract 

For aneurysms and dissections involving the aortic arch, the traditional treatment is open surgical repair requiring cardiopulmonary bypass and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. Reported mortality rates range from 7% to 17% and neurologic injury rates range from 4% to 12%. Since the first clinical applications of endovascular repair in the early 1990s, this less-invasive treatment modality has evolved steadily. For the treatment of aortic arch pathologies, combined open and endovascular strategies (hybrid procedures) have gained a widespread implementation. Evidence to date proves the feasibility of open surgical branch re-vascularisation followed by endovascular repair into the proximal arch. For hybrid procedures, mortality and stroke rates are given as 0–20%, and 0–8%, respectively. Alternative approaches using fenestrated and branched stent grafts have been considered. Although this technique is challenging and devices are not available widely, it is anticipated that this new technique will expand the range of aortic arch pathologies that can be treated by endovascular means.

Keywords: Aortic arch, Endovascular repair, Hybrid procedures, Branched stentgrafts

 

Conventional surgical repair of aortic arch pathology is an invasive procedure necessitating arch replacement with cardiopulmonary bypass and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. Despite advances in surgical techniques, anaesthesia and intensive care management, reported mortality rates range between 7% and 17% and the rate of gross neurologic injury ranges from 4% to 12% with a direct correlation between advanced age and adverse outcome.1, 2, 3, 4 Since the first endovascular application of a self-fixing synthetic prosthesis for the treatment of a traumatic thoracic aortic aneurysm by Volodos and associates5 in 1988, this less-invasive procedure became an alternative modality to open surgical repair. Although various pathologies such as atherosclerotic aneurysms and dissections often involve the origin of the supra-aortic branches, hybrid techniques (i.e., open/endovascular combination approaches) have extended endovascular treatment options. Alternatively, first experiences with fenestrated stent grafts,6 branched stent grafts7, 8, 9 and the double-barrel technique10 for preservation of aortic arch branches have been reported. Besides the involvement of aortic arch vessels, endovascular aortic arch repair might be impeded by extreme arch angulations, the high blood flow and the pulsatile movement of the aorta in this area. The imperative of re-vascularisation of arch vessels prior to the stent-graft procedure depends on the required proximal stent-graft attachments, and different technical opportunities are discussed. Although these adjunctive techniques incorporate invasive surgical procedures, it is believed that minimising the procedural invasiveness, by avoiding aortic cross-clamping and/or hypothermic circulatory arrest, morbidity and mortality outcomes can be improved, especially in high-risk patients. Several surgical approaches and techniques have been described for various levels of aortic arch involvement with encouraging early and mid-term results, although the long-term durability of these hybrid surgical–endovascular procedures remains to be defined.

Back to Article Outline

The Frozen Elephant Trunk Technique 

Extensive aortic pathologies involving the ascending aorta, aortic arch and the descending aorta remain a challenging issue in aortic repair. The frozen elephant trunk technique (FET), as an advancement of the conventional elephant trunk technique introduced by Borst and collegues11 in 1983, has been developed as an alternative treatment option.12, 13, 14, 15 In this single-stage procedure, replacement of the ascending aorta and the aortic arch is performed in a conventional fashion with a median sternotomy. It is followed by an antegrade endovascular stent-graft insertion into the descending aorta through the opened aortic arch. Although experience with FET is limited, results reported during the past years seem to be encouraging (Table 1).16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 The averaged mortality rate in the analysed series is 5.6%, and the averaged stroke rate and spinal cord injury rate is 6.0% and 5.6%, respectively. However, a high rate of postoperative paraplegia was reported by Flores et al.21 In their study cohort, lower limb paraparesis or monoparesis was evident in six (24%) patients, and history of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair combined with a distal landing zone of the stent-graft of T7 or greater was the strongest predictor for spinal cord injury (71% vs. 6%, p=0.0047). Further, major complications reported with the FET are left recurrent nerve injury in up to 12.8%,18 and renal failure requiring dialysis and prolonged ventilation in up to 15% and 12%, respectively.16 In patients who had computed tomography (CT) follow-up postoperatively, a complete thrombosis of the perigraft space around the stented segment was found in 78–100%.16, 18, 19, 20 Shimamurs et al.17 reported an actuarial freedom from endoleak of 98% and 91.1% for 1 year and 5 years, respectively.

Table 1. Results with frozen elephant trunk procedures
AuthorYearMortalityStrokeSpinal cord injury
Di Bartolomeo et al.20092/34 (6%)a0/34 (0%)3/34 (9%)
Shimamura et al.20084/126 (3.2%)b7/126 (5.6%)8/126 (6.4%)
Baraki et al.20075/39 (12.8%)a5/39 (12.8%)0/39 (0%)
Liu et al.20062/60 (3.3%)a3/60 (5.0%)1/60 (1.6%)
Uchida et al.20062/35 (5.7%)b0/35 (0%)0/35 (0%)
Flores et al.20063/25 (12%)a4/25 (16%)6/25 (24%)

Total 18/319 (5.6%)19/319 (6.0%)18/319 (5.6%)

a=inhospital mortality.

b=30-day mortality.

Back to Article Outline

Endovascular Elephant Trunk Completion 

The conventional elephant trunk technique for extensive thoracic aneurysm and dissection repair is an accepted surgical approach. However, mortality of the second stage of the procedure, consisting of completion of distal anastomosis through a left thoracotomy approach, was reported in up to 9.6% in a recent series.22 Being seen as an opportunity for reduction of the mortality associated with the second stage of the elephant trunk technique, transfemoral endovascular stent-graft implantation was used to complete the distal repair.23, 24 Experiences with this two-stage procedure are limited and operative mortality for the endovascular completion is reported in 0–8.3% in the case series published.23, 24, 25 Moreover, there were no reported cases of permanent paraplegia.

Back to Article Outline

Re-vascularisation of Supra-aortic Branches Prior to Stent-graft Therapy 

Successful stent-graft placement and sealing require a satisfactory proximal landing zone of at least 20mm in length. To overcome the anatomic limitation of proximal landing zones, combined surgical supra-aortic debranching and endovasular techniques as a one-26 or two-stage procedure have gained an innovative approach for aortic arch repair. According to the Criado classification27 of the thoracic aortic landing zones, different hybrid procedures are currently the subject of active investigations. The classification provides an uniform nomenclature and is defined as follows: zone 0 is the ascending aorta from the aortic valve including the innominate artery, zone 1 from just beyond the origin of the innominate artery including the left common carotid artery (CCA); zone 2 from just beyond the origin of the left CCA including the left subclavian artery; and zone 3 from just beyond the origin of the left subclavian artery (LSA) to the beginning of the descending thoracic aorta.

Landing zone 0 

For a hybrid approach to arch pathology that encompasses all supra-aortic vessels (zone 0), one relatively standard procedural strategy is debranching of supra-aortic vessels and re-vascularisation of the innominate and left carotid artery by placement of a bifurcated graft in the anterior aspect of the ascending aorta (Fig. 1).28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 In contrast to bifurcated grafts, Szeto et al.36 reported their experience in eight patients with the use of a trifurcated Dacron graft and re-vascularisation of all supra-aortic vessels. As another option, femoroaxillary bypasses as an extrathoracic approach27 or the descending aorta as source for a bypass37 have been also described. After surgical re-vascularisation, stent-graft implantation may be performed simultaneously in the same operating setting with the option for additional surgical measures, such external banding in case of incomplete sealing of the proximal attachment site. Primary banding of the distal segment of the ascending aorta for prevention of further dilation and stent-graft migration has found favour with some surgeons.30, 38

  • View full-size image.
  • Figure 1 

    Aortic arch aneurysm necessitating anchoring of the stent-graft in zone 0 and aneurysm of the descending aorta. A total arch rerouting was performed by the use of an inversed bifurcated graft prosthesis with end-to-end anastomosis between the first branch and the brachiocephalic trunk and between the second branch and the LSA. The left CCA was reinserted into the branch of the LSA (A). Successful exclusion of both aneurysms after EVAR (B).

Landing zone 1 

Anchoring of the stent graft in zone 1 requires re-vascularisation of the left CCA, which is most commonly achieved through construction of a right CCA to left CCA bypass.28, 29, 30, 31 This extrathoracic procedure is less invasive than those performed through a median sternotomy. Patency rates of such bypasses were reported in 88% at 3 years and 84% at 5 years with primary-assisted-patency rates exceeding 90%.39 As an alternate, transposition of the left CCA to the brachiocephalic trunk (Fig. 2) has been claimed to be advantageous compared to bypasses because of avoidance of alloplastic material, and consequently less risk for infection.33, 40 However, this procedure presupposes at least an upper hemi-sternotomy. Depending on individual anatomic variables, the left subclavian artery (LSA) may be re-vascularised or simply covered by the subsequently placed stent graft. As an alternative to simultaneous surgical/endovascular procedures, most interventionalists prefer a staged procedure for endovascular repair due to better technical equipment in the angiosuite. Further advantages are a shorter procedure time and therefore less stress for the patient and avoidance of double burden of the renal function due to blood loss and contrast load.

  • View full-size image.
  • Figure 2 

    Distal arch aneurysm necessitating anchoring of the stent-graft in zone 1. Transposition of the left CCA and of the LSA was performed prior to EVAR (A). Successful exclusion of the aneurysm after stent-graft implantation (B). Krainz Elfriede.

Landing zone 2 

A substantial amount of thoracic aortic pathologies involves the distal arch adjacent to the LSA. Stent-graft repair in this condition will necessitate partial or complete overstenting of LSA origin. In a few series, overstenting of the LSA41, 42, 43, 44 is reported as a feasible and well-tolerated procedure for fixation of the stent graft. In the study group of Görich and co-workers43 with incomplete overstenting of LSA in four and complete occlusion of the LSA in 19 patients, three (13.6%) patients reported ischaemic arm symptoms but none of the patients had persistent signs of vertebrobasilary insufficiency. More recently, Riesenman et al.45 reported their experience in 112 patients, out of whom 18 had complete and 10 patients partial coverage of the LSA. The overall incidence of cerebrovascular accident in this study was 4.5%, with a much higher incidence (10.7%) in the group of patients that had partial or complete LSA coverage. Contemporary data from the European Valiant registry,46 including 180 patients, reported stroke and paraplegia rates of 3.8% and 3.3%, respectively. Six out of seven patients, who suffered from stroke, had a fixation of the stent graft proximal to the LSA, and the stroke rate in patients with LSA occlusion was 9% compared with 0.8% of patients with no coverage or re-vascularisation of the LSA. Recently, a report from the EUROSTAR registry47 of 606 patients stated that occlusion of the LSA was associated with a higher risks of neurological complications. In the study group reported by Schoder et al.,48 only two (25%) of eight patients with complete occlusion of the overstented LSA were without symptoms at any time. Furthermore, in the study by Reece et al.,49 four (20%) out of 20 patients developed late symptoms between 3 and 26 months after a stent-graft procedure with occlusion of the LSA.

Therefore, to minimise the risk for ischaemic complications, one should evaluate the carotid and vertebral arteries, as well as the circle of Willis before intentional LSA occlusion. Anatomic variants, such as origin of the left vertebral artery at the arch or a non-existing fusion of the vertebral arteries to the basilary artery, an inadequate contralateral vertebral artery (VA) and presence of a left internal mammary artery bypass, do not allow LSA occlusion without previous re-vascularisation. Furthermore, prophylactic LSA re-vascularisation should be kept in mind in young patients, in left-handed professionals or in case of previous abdominal aortic surgery to prevent paraplegia. However, management of the LSA, including previous elective re-vascularisation, remains a debated issue.29, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51

Results 

Evidence to date proves the feasibility of arch vessel re-vascularisation followed by endovascular repair into zone 0 and 1 of the aorta (Table 2). However, there exist no controlled studies, and the decision to embark on a hybrid strategy depends on the clinician's individual judgment. Presence of endoleaks with respect to different landing zones and the length of proximal anchoring zone were evaluated in the study by Melissano et al.29 Stent-graft placement into zone 0 was performed in 14 patients with a mean length of the proximal landing zone (PLZ) of 43.9mm after supra-aortic vessel debranching. In zones 1 and 2, the mean PLZ reached 28.4mm and 30.4mm, respectively. A type I or III endoleak in zones 0 and 2 occurred in 7.1% and 7.9%, respectively, whereas in zone 1, having the shortest landing zone, the rate of type Ia endoleaks was 33.3%. Furthermore, after stent-graft anchoring in zone 0, a higher risk of cerebrovascular accident was observed (14.3% compared with 0% in zones 1 and 2). Similar findings were reported by Freezor et al.50 who found a significant higher incidence of strokes with proximal extent of repair. Seven (78%) of nine patients who had a stroke had coverage of zone 0–2, while 2 (22%) had anchoring of the stent graft distal to the LSA. Out of all patients suffering from stroke, six had posterior circulation stroke associated with coverage of zones 0–2, and only one of the patients had carotid–subclavian bypass prior to stent-graft placement. From the data thus obtained, it might be presumed that re-vascularisation of the LSA is a crucial point in endovascular arch repair. In the latter study, the rate of posterior circulation stroke decreased from 5.5% to 1.2% after adoption of head and neck imaging prior to aortic arch repair.

Table 2. Results after hybrid arch procedures including landing zones 0 and 1
AuthorYearMortalityStrokeSpinal cord injuryEL Ia
Weigang et al.20094/26 (15.4%)0/26 (0%)0/26 (0%)0/26 (0%)
Melissano et al.20072/26 (7.7%)2/26 (7.7%)0/26 (0%)5/26 (19,2%)
Czerny et al.20072/27 (7.4%)0/27 (0%)0/27 (0%)4/27 (14,8%)
Bergeron et al.20062/25 (8%)2/25 (8%)1/25 (4%)3/25 (12%)
Saleh et al.20060/15 (0%)0/15 (0%)0/15 (0%)0/15 (0%)
Schumacher et al.20065/25 (20%)1/25 (4%)0/25 (0%)3/25 (12%)

Total 15/144 (10.4%)5/144 (3.5%)1/144 (0.7%)15/144 (10.4%)

EL Ia=endoleak at proximal landing zone.

Retrograde dissection after stent grafting of the arch is reported in various series.48, 52, 53 The anatomy of the arch might obviate the stent graft to accommodate, and the limited flexibility of the devices might produce forced wall stress at the outer curvature leading to intimal injuries.

Back to Article Outline

Stent-Graft Repair Without Surgical Supra-aortic Vessel Re-vascularisation 

Endovascular repair of aortic arch pathology by means of branch artery stenting, fenestrated and branched stent grafts have been reported as case reports or small case series.6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 54, 55, 56

Branch artery stenting 

This technique was first described as a bail-out procedure to treat inadvertent coverage of the left carotid artery.57 Criado58 has reported a series of eight patients who were treated with a bare metal stent after inadvertently overstenting of the left carotid artery in six and the LSA in two patients. In this series, stent placement was technically successful in all patients without neurological complications or death. Besides an emergency use of this technique in four patients, Baldwin et al.10 reported elective stenting of the innominate artery combined with bypass surgery or vessel transposition in three cases and stenting of the LSA in one patient. Stenting of arch vessels was performed without periprocedural complications and no endoleak was observed during follow-up. Although this technique seams feasible, one must be aware that this technique provides additional proximal fixation length but not an additional sealing zone except in aortic pathologies, which are limited to the lesser curvature.

Branched stent grafts 

First experiences with branched stent grafts were reported by Inoue et al.56 in 1999 but primary success rate was only 60% with failures attributed to endoleaks and access site issues. Furthermore, major complications were provoked by multiple cerebral emboli in the vertebral artery and occlusion of the left carotid artery. A further report by this group noted promising results after single-branched stent-graft implantation in aortic aneurysms and dissections involving the LSA.8 Out of 17 patients one suffered from paraparesis, but none of the patients had a cerebrovascular embolic event. Proximal attachment site endoleaks were found in two patients, and one out of them could be treated by implantation of a double-branched stent graft. Branched stent-graft delivery from a transfemoral access site into the aortic arch is challenging due to the length and tortuousity of the route. As an alternate, device implantation through the ascending aorta was performed.31 However, this access site is not free of risks, especially in a diseased ascending aorta. Chuter et al.7 preferred a single branch from the stent graft to the innominate artery in combination with bypass grafts and a transcarotid access route.

Fenestration of stent grafts 

Repair of the distal arch with additional fenestration of the stent graft to maintain blood flow into the LSA was reported by McWilliams et al.55 Fenestration was performed with the back end of a small-gauge guidewire and the hole was enlarged by using a series of cutting balloons. Finally, the fenestration was stented with a balloon-expandable stent. Kawaguchi et al.6 reported a series of 288 patients who were treated with homemade fenestrated stent grafts. The cerebral infarction rate was 5.5% (16 cases) with a serious outcome in 1.7%, but no complications have resulted from thrombosis of arch vessels. Further complications were paraplegia in 2.6%, aortic injury in 1.2% and iliac–femoral artery injury in 6%.

Back to Article Outline

Conclusion 

Endovascular prostheses, which are currently in use, were not designed for the treatment of arch pathologies. Therefore, incomplete alignment, type 1 endoleaks, and retrograde type A dissections may occur. However, the combined endovascular and surgical treatment of aneurysms and dissections involving the aortic arch has proven to reduce the morbidity and mortality rate in comparison to a full open surgical approach. The development of more flexible or curved stent grafts is under way. Branched stent grafts are in their infancy but are needed. Due to the complex anatomic variations of the arch anatomy, the use of single-branched stent grafts is more realistic. Therefore, if combined procedures may be still required, including carotid–carotid and carotid–subclavian bypass or transposition surgery but without the need for upper sternotomies. Endovascular treatment of type A dissections is feasible and has been reported if the primary entry tear is located in the middle of the ascending aorta.59 However, the majority of entry tears are close to the aortic valve and coronary arteries which may need replacement of the ascending aorta and aortic valve by a composite graft. In conclusion, the endovascular therapy of aortic arch pathologies has proven to be a less-invasive way of treatment but needs further refinement of devices.

Back to Article Outline

References 

  1. Harrington DK, Walker AS, Kaukuntla H, Bracewell RM, Clutton-Brock TH, Faroqui M, et al. Selective antegrade cerebral perfusion attenuates brain metabolic deficit in aortic arch surgery: a prospective randomized trial. Circulation. 2004;110:231–236
  2. Westaby S, Katsumata T, Vaccari G. Arch and descending aortic aneurysms: influence of perfusion technique on neurological outcome. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999;15:180–185
  3. Bachet J, Guilmet D, Goudot B, Dreyfus GD, Delentdecker P, Brodaty D, et al. Antegrade cerebral perfusion with cold blood: a 13-year experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;67:1874–1878
  4. Strauch JT, Spielvogel D, Lauten A, Galla JD, Lansman SL, McMurtry K, et al. Technical advances in total aortic arch replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77:581–590
  5. Volodos NL, Karpovich IP, Shekhanin VE, Troian VI, Iakovenko LF. A case of distant transfemoral endoprosthesis of the thoracic artery using a self-fixing synthetic prosthesis in traumatic aneurysms. Grudn Khir. 1988;6:84–86
  6. Kawaguchi S, Yokoi Y, Shimazaki T, Koide K, Matsumoto M, Shigematsu H. Thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair in Japan: experience with fenestrated stent grafts in the treatment of distal arch aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2008;48:24S–29S
  7. Chuter TA, Schneider DB, Reilly LM, Lobo EP, Messina LM. Modular branched stent graft for endovascular repair of aortic arch aneurysm and dissection. J Vasc Surg. 2003 Oct;38(4):859–863
  8. Saito N, Kimura T, Odashiro K, Toma M, Nobuyoshi M, Ueno K, et al. Feasibility of the Inoue single-branched stent-graft implantation for thoracic aortic aneurysm or dissection involving the left subclavian artery: short- to medium-term results in 17 patients. J Vasc Surg. 2005;41:206–212
  9. Brar R, Ali T, Morgan R, Loftus I, Thompson M. Endovascular repair of an aortic arch aneurysm using a branched stent-graft. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008;36:545–549
  10. Baldwin ZK, Chuter TA, Hiramoto JS, Reilly LM, Schneider DB. Double-barrel technique for preservation of aortic arch branches during thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Ann Vasc Surg. 2008;22:703–709
  11. Borst HG, Walterbusch G, Schaps D. Extensive aortic replacement using “elephant trunk” prosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1983;31:37–40
  12. Suto Y, Yasuda K, Shiiya N, Murashita T, Kawasaki M, Imamura M, et al. Stented elephant trunk procedure for an extensive aneurysm involving distal aortic arch and descending aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;112(5):1389–1390
  13. Kato M, Ohnishi K, Kaneko M, Ueda T, Kishi D, Mizushima T, et al. New graft-implanting method for thoracic aortic aneurysm or dissection with a stented graft. Circulation. 1996;94(Suppl. II):188–193
  14. Usui A, Ueda Y, Watanabe T, Kawaguchi O, Ohara Y, Takagi Y, et al. Clinical results of implantation of an endovascular covered stent-graft via midsternotomy for distal aortic arch aneurysm. Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;8(7):545–549
  15. Karck M, Chavan A, Hagl C, Friedrich H, Galanski M, Haverich A. The frozen elephant trunk technique: a new treatment for thoracic aortic aneurysms. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;125:1550–1553
  16. Di Bartolomeo R, Di Marco L, Armaro A, Marsilli D, Leone A, Pilato E, et al. Treatment of complex disease of the thoracic aorta: the frozen elephant trunk technique with the E-vita open prosthesis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009;35(4):671–675
  17. Shimamura K, Kuratani T, Matsumiya G, Kato M, Shirakawa Y, Takano H, et al. Long-term results of the open stent-grafting technique for extended aortic arch disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;135:1261–1269
  18. Baraki H, Hagl C, Khaladj N, Kallenbach K, Weidemann J, Haverich A, et al. The frozen elephant trunk technique for treatment of thoracic aortic aneurysms. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83(2):S819–S823
  19. Liu ZG, Sun LZ, Chang Q, Zhu JM, Dong C, Yu CT, et al. Should the “elephant trunk” be skeletonized? Total arch replacement combined with stented elephant trunk implantation for stanford type A aortic dissection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;131(1):107–113
  20. Uchida N, Ishihara H, Shibamura H, Kyo Y, Ozawa M. Midterm results of extensive primary repair of the thoracic aorta by means of total arch replacement with open stent graft placement for an acute type A aortic dissection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;131(4):862–867
  21. Flores J, Kunihara T, Shiiya N, Yoshimoto K, Matsuzaki K, Yasuda K. Extensive deployment of the stented elephant trunk is associated with an increased risk of spinal cord injury. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;131(2):336–342
  22. Safi HJ, Miller CC, Estrera AL, Villa MA, Goodrick JS, Porat E, et al. Optimization of aortic arch replacement: two-stage approach. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83(2):S815–S818
  23. Greenberg RK, Haddad F, Svensson L, O’Neill S, Walker E, Lyden SP, et al. Hybrid approaches to thoracic aortic aneurysms: the role of endovascular elephant trunk completion. Circulation. 2005;112(17):2619–2626
  24. Matsuda H, Tsuji Y, Sugimoto K, Okita Y. Secondary elephant trunk fixation with endovascular stent grafting for extensive/multiple thoracic aortic aneurysm. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005;28(2):335–336
  25. Carroccio A, Spielvogel D, Ellozy SH, Lookstein RA, Chin IY, Minor ME, et al. Aortic arch and descending thoracic aortic aneurysms: experience with stent grafting for second-stage “elephant trunk” repair. Vascular. 2005;13(1):5–10
  26. Huhes GC, Nienaber JJ, Bush EL, Daneshmand MA, McCann RL. Use of custom dacron branch grafts for “hybrid” aortic debranching during endovascular repair of thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;136(1):21–28
  27. Criado FJ, Barnatan MF, Rizk Y, Clark NS, Wang CF. Technical strategies to expand stent-graft applicability in the aortic arch and proximal descending thoracic aorta. J Endovasc Ther. 2002;3(Suppl. 2):II32–II38
  28. Chan YC, Cheng SW, Ting AC, Ho P. Supra-aortic hybrid endovascular procedures for complex thoracic aortic disease: single center early to midterm results. J Vasc Surg. 2008;48:571–579
  29. Melissano G, Civilini E, Bertoglio L, Calliari F, Setacci F, Calori G, et al. Results of endografting of the aortic arch in different landing zones. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007;33:561–566
  30. Saleh HM, Inglese L. Combined surgical and endovascular treatment of aortic arch aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44:460–466
  31. Bergeron P, Mangialardi N, Costa P. Great vessel management for endovascular exclusion of aortic arch aneurysms and dissections. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006;32:38–45
  32. Weigang E, Parker J, Czerny M, Peivandi AA, Dorweiler P, Beyersdorf F, et al. Endovascular aortic arch repair after aortic arch de-branching. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;87:603–607
  33. Gottardi R, Funovics M, Eggers N, Hirner A, Dorfmeister M, Holfeld J, et al. Supra-aortic transposition for combined vascular and endovascular repair of aortic arch pathology. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;86:1524–1529
  34. Wang S, Chang G, Li X, Hu Z, Li S, Yang J, et al. Endovascular treatment of arch and proximal thoracic aortic lesions. J Vasc Surg. 2008;48:64–68
  35. Schumacher H, Von Tengg-Kobligk H, Ostovic M, Henninger V, Ockert S, Böckler D, et al. Hybrid aortic procedures for endoluminal arch replacement in thoracic aneurysms and type B dissections. J Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;47:509–517
  36. Szeto WY, Bavaria JE, Bowen FW, Woo EY, Fairman RM, Pochettino A. The hybrid total arch repair: brachiocephalic bypass and concomitant endovascular aortic arch stent graft placement. J Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;22:97–102
  37. Zhou W, Reardon M, Peden EK, Lin PH, Lumsden AB. Hybrid approach to complex thoracic aortic aneurysms in high-risk patients: surgical challenges and clinical outcome. J Vasc Surg. 2006;13:5–10
  38. Antona C, Vanelli P, Petulla M, Gelpi G, Danna P, Lemma M, et al. Hybrid technique for total arch repair: aortic neck reshaping for endovascular-graft fixation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83:1158–1161
  39. Ozsvath KJ, Roddy SP, Darling RC, Byrne J, Kreienberg PB, Choi D, et al. Carotid-carotid crossover bypass: is it a durable procedure?. J Vasc Surg. 2003;37:582–585
  40. Czerny M, Gottardi R, Zimpfer D, Schoder M, Grabenwöger M, Lammer J, et al. Mid-term results of supraaortic transpositions for extended endovascular repair of aortic arch pathologies. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007;31:623–627
  41. Nienaber CA, Ince H, Weber F, Rehders T, Petzsch M, Meinertz T, et al. Emergency stent-graft placement in thoracic aortic dissection and evolving rupture. J Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;18:464–470
  42. Sunder-Plassmann L, Scharrer-Pamler R, Liewald F, Kapfer X, Görich J, Orend KH. Endovascular exclusion of thoracic aortic aneurysms: mid-term results of elective treatment and in contained rupture. J Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;18:367–374
  43. Görich J, Asquan Y, Seifarth H, Krämer S, Kapfer X, Orend KH, et al. Initial experience with intentional stent-graft coverage of the subclavian artery during endovascular thoracic aortic repairs. J Endovasc Ther. 2002;9:II39–II43
  44. Hausegger KA, Oberwalder P, Tiesenhausen K, Tauss J, Stanger O, Schedlbauer P, et al. Intentional left subclavian artery occlusion by thoracic aortic stent-grafts without surgical transposition. J Endovasc Ther. 2001;8:472–476
  45. Riesenman PJ, Farber MA, Mendes RR, Marston WA, Fulton JJ, Keagy BA. Coverage of the left subclavian artery during thoracic endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg. 2007;45(1):90–95
  46. Thompson M, Ivaz S, Cheshire N, Fattori R, Rousseau H, Heijmen R, et al. Early results of endovascular treatment of the thoracic aorta using the valiant endograft. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2007;30:1130–1138
  47. Buth J, Harris PL, Hobo R, van Eps R, Cuypers P, Duijm L, et al. Neurologic complications associated with endovascular repair of thoracic aortic pathology: incidence and risk factors. A study from the European collaborators on stent/graft techniques for aortic aneurysm repair (EUROSTAR) registry. J Vasc Surg. 2007;46:1103–1111
  48. Schoder M, Grabenwöger M, Hölzenbein T, Cejna M, Ehrlich MP, Rand T, et al. Endovascular repair of the thoracic aorta necessitating anchoring of the stent graft across the arch vessels. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;131:380–387
  49. Reece TB, Gazoni LM, Cherry KJ, Peeler BB, Dake M, Matsumoto AH, et al. Reevaluating the need for left subclavian artery revascularization with thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84:1201–1205
  50. Freezor RJ, Martin TD, Hess PJ, Klodell CT, Beaver TM, Huber TS, et al. Risk factors for perioperative stroke during thoracic endovascular aortic repairs (TEVAR). J Endovasc Ther. 2007;14:568–573
  51. Noor N, Sadat U, Hayes PD, Thompson MM, Boyle JR. Management of the left subclavian artery during endovascular repair of the thoracic aorta. J Endovasc Ther. 2008;15:168–176
  52. Orend KH, Scharrer-Pamler R, Kapfer X, Kotsis T, Görich J, Sunder-Plassmann L. Endovascular treatment in diseases of the descending thoracic aorta: 6-year results of a single center. J Vasc Surg. 2003;37:91–99
  53. Fattori R, Napoli G, Lovato L, Grazia C, Piva T, Rocchi G, et al. Descending thoracic aortic diseases: stent-graft repair. Radiology. 2003;229:176–183
  54. Ohrlander T, Sonesson B, Ivancev K, Resch T, Dias N, Malina M. The chimney graft: a technique for preserving or rescuing aortic branch vessels in stent-graft sealing zones. J Endovasc Ther. 2008;15:427–432
  55. Mc Williams RG, Murphy M, Hartley D, Lawrence-Braun MM, Harris PL. In situ stent-graft fenestration to preserve the left subclavian artery. J Endovasc Ther. 2004;11:170–174
  56. Inoue K, Hosokawa H, Iwase T, Sato M, Yoshida Y, Ueno K, et al. Aortic arch reconstruction by transluminally placed endovascular branched stent graft. Circulation. 1999;100(Suppl.):316–321
  57. Hiramoto JS, Schneider DB, Reilly LM, Chuter TA. A double-barrel stent-graft for endovascular repair of the aortic arch. J Endovasc Ther. 2006;13:72–76
  58. Criado FJ. A percutaneous technique for preservation of arch branch patency during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR): retrograde catheterization and stenting. J Endovasc Ther. 2007;14:54–58
  59. Zimpfer D, Czerny M, Kettenbach J, Schoder M, Wolner E, Lammer J, et al. Treatment of acute type A dissection by percutaneous endovascular stent-graft placement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;82(2):747–749

PII: S1078-5884(09)00324-4

doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.06.007

European Journal of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery
Volume 38, Issue 3 , Pages 255-261, September 2009

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution