Volume 39, Supplement 1 , Pages S44-S48, March 2010
Carotid Endarterectomy versus Carotid Angioplasty Cui Bono☆
Abstract
Objectives
To evaluate the current status of carotid angioplasty (CAS) versus carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in the management of patients with carotid bifurcation disease.
Design
Retrospective review of published and presented prospective randomized trials to date, regarding comparative results of CAS versus CEA.
Materials
Review of six published prospective randomized trials, one trial presented in press, and one trial completed and being analyzed. Large population based studies and a comparative registry study are also included.
Methods
Retrospective literature review.
Results
The results today favor CEA over CAS with respect to stroke morbidity, mortality, freedom from recurrence, and cost.
Conclusions
At the present time, CEA remains the intervention of choice in the management of carotid bifurcation disease.
Keywords: Carotid angioplasty, Carotid endarterectomy, Prospective randomized trials, Comparative results
To access this article, please choose from the options below
☆ Division of Vascular Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, The Invited Rutherford Lecture, Presented at the XXIII Annual Meeting 3–6 September, 2009, European Society for Vascular Surgery, Oslo, Norway.
PII: S1078-5884(09)00515-2
doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.10.007
© 2009 Published by Elsevier Inc.
Volume 39, Supplement 1 , Pages S44-S48, March 2010
