Advertisement
ejvese
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages 134-138 (February 2010)


View previous. 3 of 30 View next.

Relationship of Carotid Plaque Echomorphology to Presenting Symptom

D.A. RussellabCorresponding Author Informationemail address, S.M. Wijeyaratnec, M.J. Gougha

Received 12 May 2009; accepted 2 November 2009. published online 25 November 2009.

Abstract 

Background

Attempts to stratify carotid plaques according to clinical risk using single longitudinal view (SLV) echomorphology have not been uniformly successful. We compared SLV grey scale median measurements (SLV-GSM) with a newer technique of multiple cross-sectional view echomorphology (MCSV-GSM) in carotid plaques from 3 patient groups (asymptomatic, ocular, and hemispheric symptoms).

Methods

SLV and MCSV images were obtained from 109 carotid stenoses (70–99%; 41 hemispheric, 17 ocular, 51 asymptomatic). SLV-GSM and MCSV-GSMmin (lowest plaque MCSV image GSM) were determined to assess echolucency whilst MCSV-GSMmax−min (highest minus lowest MCSV-GSM) assessed heterogeneity.

Results

Echolucency was greater (lower GSM) in plaques causing hemispheric symptoms versus asymptomatic plaques (MCSV-GSMmin, P = .002; SLV-GSM, P = .002). Only MCSV imaging detected differences in echolucency between asymptomatic plaques and those causing ocular symptoms (SLV-GSM, p = 0.84; MCSV-GSMmin, p = .003). Symptomatic plaques showed greater heterogeneity versus asymptomatic plaques, significantly in those causing ocular symptoms (hemispheric P = .126; AF P = .011).

Conclusions

Both SLV and MCSV echomorphology confirm increased echolucency in plaques causing hemispheric symptoms. Plaques causing ocular symptoms could only be distinguished from asymptomatic plaques with MCSV assessment (increased echolucency and heterogeneity). This suggests that amaurosis fugax may be associated with a more focal plaque instability that is best detected with MCSV imaging.

a Leeds Vascular Institute, The General Infirmary at Leeds, Leeds LS1 3EX, United Kingdom

b Department of Surgery, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia

c Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Leeds Vascular Institute, The General Infirmary at Leeds, Great George Street, Leeds LS1 3EX, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom. Tel.: +44 113 392 2823; fax: +44 113 392 2624.

PII: S1078-5884(09)00570-X

doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.11.003


View previous. 3 of 30 View next.