European Journal of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery
Volume 40, Issue 1 , Pages 35-43, July 2010

Percutaneous Endovascular Treatment of Innominate Artery Lesions: A Single-centre Experience on 77 Lesions

  • T.M. Paukovits

      Affiliations

    • Heart Center, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1122 Gaal Jozsef Street 9, Budapest, Hungary
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Heart Center, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Varosmajor utca 68, 1023 Budapest, Hungary. Tel.: +47 94250042.
  • ,
  • L. Lukács

      Affiliations

    • Heart Center, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1122 Gaal Jozsef Street 9, Budapest, Hungary
  • ,
  • V. Bérczi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology and Oncotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
  • ,
  • K. Hirschberg

      Affiliations

    • Heart Center, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1122 Gaal Jozsef Street 9, Budapest, Hungary
  • ,
  • B. Nemes

      Affiliations

    • Heart Center, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1122 Gaal Jozsef Street 9, Budapest, Hungary
  • ,
  • K. Hüttl

      Affiliations

    • Heart Center, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1122 Gaal Jozsef Street 9, Budapest, Hungary

Received 1 November 2009; accepted 12 March 2010. published online 03 May 2010.

Abstract 

Purpose

To assess primary success and safety of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and/or stenting of innominate artery lesions and to compare its 30-day stroke/mortality level with the literature data.

Methods

A total of 72 patients (77 stenoses, five recurrent, 58 symptomatic and 39 female) with seven innominate vessel occlusions, nine subocclusive lesions and 61 significant (>60%) stenoses of innominate artery treated between 2000 and 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. With the exception of seven, all procedures were performed using a transfemoral approach. A stent was implanted in 49 (63.6%) cases. Follow-up included neurological examination, carotid duplex scan and office/telephone interview.

Results

Primary technical success was 93.5% (72/77). There was neither periprocedural (<48h) death, nor major neurological complication. Minor periprocedural neurological complications consisted of 2/72 (2.6%) ipsilateral TIAs. Access site complications included 4 (5.2%) access site bleedings. Follow-up was achieved in 65/72 (90.3%) of all patients and 68 (88.3%) of all procedures for a mean of 42.3 months and revealed neither major neurological complication, nor additional TIA.

The cumulative primary patency rate was 100% at 12 months, 98±1.6% at 24 months, and 69.9±8.5% at 96 months. The cumulative secondary patency rate was 100% at 12 and at 24 months, and 81.5±7.7% at 96 months. Log-rank test showed no significant difference (p=0.79) in primary cumulative patencies between PTA alone (n=28) or PTA/stent (n=49).

Conclusion

Transfemoral PTA with or without stent appears to be a safe treatment option for innominate artery lesions.

Keywords: Angioplasty, Brachiocephalic trunk, Innominate artery, Neurological complications, Patency rate, Percutaneous intervention

 

PII: S1078-5884(10)00199-1

doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.03.017

European Journal of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery
Volume 40, Issue 1 , Pages 35-43, July 2010