European Journal of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery
Volume 40, Issue 1 , Pages 54-59, July 2010

Controlled Hypotension in Patients Suspected of a Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Feasibility during Transport by Ambulance Services and Possible Harm

  • J.J. Reimerink

      Affiliations

    • Department of Vascular Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • L.L. Hoornweg

      Affiliations

    • Department of Vascular Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • A.C. Vahl

      Affiliations

    • Department of Vascular Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouw Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • W. Wisselink

      Affiliations

    • Department of Vascular Surgery, Vrije Universiteit Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • R. Balm

      Affiliations

    • Department of Vascular Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. R. Balm. Department of Vascular Surgery G4-107, Academic Medical Center, P.O. Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31 20 566 7832; fax: +31 20 566 9243.

Received 11 September 2009; accepted 19 March 2010. published online 26 April 2010.

Abstract 

Objective

To evaluate a controlled hypotension protocol for patients suspected of a ruptured aneurysm of the abdominal aorta (RAAA) and to identify possible harm to patients with a final diagnosis other than RAAA.

Design

Retrospective analysis of patients suspected of RAAA and transported by Amsterdam ambulance services between January 2006 and October 2007.

Patients and methods

Protocol was assessed by reviewing systolic blood pressure (<80mmHg, 80–100mmHg or >100mmHg), administered fluid volume and verbal responsiveness during transport. Patients who could possibly have been harmed by controlled hypotension were identified by final diagnoses.

Results

Fluid administration was according to protocol in 220 of 266 patients analysed for protocol adherence. The remaining patients received too much (21 patients) or too little fluid (25 patients). Data were missing in 29 patients. A RAAA was diagnosed in 81 (27%) of all 295 patients analysed for final diagnosis. Controlled hypotension was achieved in 10% of all patients and in 17% of patients with RAAA. Three patients (1%) with diagnosis other than RAAA were possibly at risk by implementing controlled hypotension.

Conclusions

Protocol was followed in 83% and protocol violations occurred in 17% of patients. The risk of implementing controlled hypotension for all patients suspected of an RAAA by the ambulance staff was low.

Keywords: Aneurysm, Ruptured, Aortic aneurysm, Abdominal, Hypotension, Controlled

 

PII: S1078-5884(10)00208-X

doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.03.022

European Journal of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery
Volume 40, Issue 1 , Pages 54-59, July 2010