« Previous
Next »
European Journal of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery
Volume 40, Issue 4
, Pages
475-482
, October 2010
Carotid Endarterectomy for Symptomatic, but “Haemodynamically Insignificant” Carotid Stenosis
-
Case 1 CT angiogram showing 50% stenosis and soft plaque (A); Catheter angiogram (lateral projection) showing a minimal stenosis (B); Diffusion-weighted MRI showing multiple small middle cerebral arte
Case 1 CT angiogram showing 50% stenosis and soft plaque (A); Catheter angiogram (lateral projection) showing a minimal stenosis (B); Diffusion-weighted MRI showing multiple small middle cerebral artery territory infarcts(C); Carotid duplex showing 40-60% stenosis with soft plaque (CCA= common carotid artery, ICA= internal carotid artery. small stem arrows show plaque surface, large stem arrows show vessel wall) (D); Hemorrhagic plaque found at operation (E).
-
Carotid duplex (Case 2) showing 50–70% stenosis with echolucent plaque (arrowed and outlined), thought to represent intra-plaque hemorrhage. (ICA = internal carotid artery, ECA = external carotid arteCarotid duplex (Case 2) showing 50–70% stenosis with echolucent plaque (arrowed and outlined), thought to represent intra-plaque hemorrhage. (ICA = internal carotid artery, ECA = external carotid artery).
-
Catheter angiogram Stenosis on lateral projection of catheter angiogram (A) appears to be less than 50%, but on MRI was estimated to be 70%. Plaque removed at CEA was ulcerated and haemorrhagic (B).Catheter angiogram Stenosis on lateral projection of catheter angiogram (A) appears to be less than 50%, but on MRI was estimated to be 70%. Plaque removed at CEA was ulcerated and haemorrhagic (B).
PII: S1078-5884(10)00429-6
doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.07.003
© 2010 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
European Journal of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery
Volume 40, Issue 4
, Pages
475-482
, October 2010
