« PreviousNext »European Journal of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery
Volume 40, Issue 4 , Page 421, October 2010
Volume 40, Issue 4 , Page 421, October 2010
Trans-Atlantic Debate: Is a Randomised Trial Necessary to Determine Whether Endovascular Repair is the Preferred Management Strategy in Patients with Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms?☆
To access this article, please choose from the options below
☆ This paper is also being published in the Journal of Vascular Surgery.
PII: S1078-5884(10)00485-5
doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.08.003
© 2010 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Refers to article:
- Part One: For the Motion: A randomised controlled trial is the best way to determine whether endovascular repair is the preferred management strategy in patients with a ruptured aortic aneurysm , 18 August 2010
- Part Two: Against the Motion: It is not necessary to perform a randomised trial to compare open and endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms , 23 July 2010
« PreviousNext »European Journal of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery
Volume 40, Issue 4 , Page 421, October 2010
Volume 40, Issue 4 , Page 421, October 2010
