« PreviousNext »European Journal of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery
Volume 40, Issue 4 , Pages 427-428, October 2010
Volume 40, Issue 4 , Pages 427-428, October 2010
Trans-Atlantic Debate: Is a Randomised Trial Necessary to Determine Whether Endovascular Repair is the Preferred Management Strategy in Patients with Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms?
To access this article, please choose from the options below
PII: S1078-5884(10)00486-7
doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.08.004
© 2010 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Refers to article:
- Part One: For the Motion: A randomised controlled trial is the best way to determine whether endovascular repair is the preferred management strategy in patients with a ruptured aortic aneurysm , 18 August 2010
- Part Two: Against the Motion: It is not necessary to perform a randomised trial to compare open and endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms , 23 July 2010
« PreviousNext »European Journal of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery
Volume 40, Issue 4 , Pages 427-428, October 2010
Volume 40, Issue 4 , Pages 427-428, October 2010
