If you don't remember your password, you can reset it by entering your email address and clicking the Reset Password button. You will then receive an email that contains a secure link for resetting your password
If the address matches a valid account an email will be sent to __email__ with instructions for resetting your password
Corresponding author. K. C. Santo, Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK.
This case highlights the successful management of acute Type B dissection complicated by visceral malperfusion. Even though the procedure of hybrid supra-aortic translocation and endovascular stenting corrected the malperfusion, it is important for vigilant CT scan surveillance for the post operative complications which can occur with this procedure.
This case highlights the successful management of acute Type B dissection complicated by visceral malperfusion. Even though the procedure of hybrid supra-aortic translocation and endovascular stenting corrected the malperfusion, it is important for vigilant CT scan surveillance for the post operative complications which can occur with this procedure.
Case Report
A 56 year old female was admitted with history of sudden onset chest pain. Acute coronary syndrome was suspected but angiography revealed a type B dissection confirmed on CT scanning (Fig. 1). Medical management was initiated but on day 9 post-event she complained of further back pain and was noted to have deteriorating renal and liver function and haematuria. A repeat CT scan demonstrated partial right renal and liver ischaemia due to malperfusion (Fig. 2A). The type B dissection arose immediately adjacent to the left subclavian artery and the supra-aortic vessels arose in close proximity (Fig. 1). Endovascular stent grafting
because of the supra-aortic anatomy and arch curvature. A hybrid operation was performed comprising total supra-aortic vessel translocation using the three side-arms of a Gelweave Vascutek Plexus (Vascutek Ltd, Renfrewshire, UK) aortic arch graft with the patch anastomosed to the proximal ascending aorta using a side-biting clamp without utilising cardiopulmonary bypass (Fig. 3). A 38 mm Medtronic Valient stent graft (Medtronic Limited, Hertfordshire, UK) was then satisfactorily deployed via the femoral artery from zone 0 to zone 3. The initial recovery was uneventful with resolution of pain, normalisation of renal function and improved kidney perfusion on check CT scanning done immediately postop (Fig. 2B). On post-operative day 14, the patient collapsed with an electromechanical cardiac arrest from which she could not be resuscitated. Post-mortem examination demonstrated a type A dissection with intra-pericardial rupture. A review of the check CT scan revealed an intimal tear in the proximal ascending aorta (Fig. 3 A, B); this was initially perceived to be related to the patch graft insertion.
Fig. 1Preoperative saggital CT scan demonstrating Type B dissection (A) extending to the left common carotid (LCCA) and necessitating overstenting of all supra-aortic vessels. BA- Brachiocephalic artery, LSA- Left subclavian artery.
Fig. 3Saggital (A) and 3-D reconstructed (B) CT images following EVAR. The trifurcating supra-aortic bypass is shown(black filled triangle) together with the stent deployed into zone 0-1 (white triangle). The white arrows demonstrate a proximal aortic dissection initially attributed to the patch implantation of the trifurcating patch graft.
Supra-aortic vessel translocation to allow secure stent deployment is sometimes necessary. However, the non-dissected aorta may also be abnormal in such patients and this case illustrates the need for great caution and vigilance in post-operative CT scan assessment to ensure that iatrogenic aortic injury is prevented or detected.
References
Nienaber C.A.
Fattori R.
Lund G.
Dieckmann C.
Wolf W.
Pierangeli A.
et al.
Nonsurgical reconstruction of thoracic aortic dissection by stent-graft placement.
To submit a comment for a journal article, please use the space above and note the following:
We will review submitted comments as soon as possible, striving for within two business days.
This forum is intended for constructive dialogue. Comments that are commercial or promotional in nature, pertain to specific medical cases, are not relevant to the article for which they have been submitted, or are otherwise inappropriate will not be posted.
We require that commenters identify themselves with names and affiliations.