Introduction: This study investigated our practice of performing a pre-operative ‘trial of stiff guidewire’ to assess whether iliac artery tortuosity may be overcome, prior to denying patients endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR).
Report: During the 58-month study period, 35 ‘trial of stiff guidewire’ procedures were performed, the thirty-one of whom ‘passed’ were suitable for EVAR. Four patients whose iliac anatomy could not be straightened (failing the trial of stiff guidewire) were offered open surgery only.
Discussion: If the iliac artery can be straightened using the stiff wire, to a bend less acute than 80°, patients may still be offered EVAR.
Article info
Publication history
Published online: September 17, 2012
Identification
Copyright
© 2012 Published by Elsevier Inc.
User license
Elsevier user license | How you can reuse
Elsevier's open access license policy

Elsevier user license
Permitted
For non-commercial purposes:
- Read, print & download
- Text & data mine
- Translate the article
Not Permitted
- Reuse portions or extracts from the article in other works
- Redistribute or republish the final article
- Sell or re-use for commercial purposes
Elsevier's open access license policy
ScienceDirect
Access this article on ScienceDirectLinked Article
- ‘Trial of Stiff Guidewire’: A Useful Adjunct to Determining Suitability for Endovascular Aneurysm RepairEJVES ExtraVol. 24Issue 4Open Access
Related Articles
Comments
Commenting Guidelines
To submit a comment for a journal article, please use the space above and note the following:
- We will review submitted comments as soon as possible, striving for within two business days.
- This forum is intended for constructive dialogue. Comments that are commercial or promotional in nature, pertain to specific medical cases, are not relevant to the article for which they have been submitted, or are otherwise inappropriate will not be posted.
- We require that commenters identify themselves with names and affiliations.
- Comments must be in compliance with our Terms & Conditions.
- Comments are not peer-reviewed.