Advertisement
EJVES Extra Abstract| Volume 44, ISSUE 5, P527, November 2012

Revascularisation of Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysm near the Skull Base

Open ArchivePublished:September 25, 2012DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.08.014
      A 51-year-old man presented with a pulsatile neck mass. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) revealed a right internal carotid aneurysm. No neurological symptoms occurred for more than 40 years in this patient, which indicated a possible congenital lesion worsened by secondary atherosclerosis. The aneurysm extended from the carotid bifurcation nearly to the base of the skull, and a normal internal carotid artery (ICA) segment was found before entering the carotid canal. The distal end of the extracranial ICA was exposed by transecting the digastric muscle and removing the styloid process during the procedures. The external carotid artery (ECA) was chosen as the inflow source in order to shorten the clamping time of the ICA. His recovery was uneventful, and the follow-up at 2 years revealed that carotid artery patency was obtained.

      Linked Article

      • Revascularisation of Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysm near the Skull Base
        EJVES ExtraVol. 24Issue 4
        • Preview
          A 51-year-old man presented with a pulsatile neck mass. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) revealed a right internal carotid aneurysm. No neurological symptoms occurred for more than 40 years in this patient, which indicated a possible congenital lesion worsened by secondary atherosclerosis. The aneurysm extended from the carotid bifurcation nearly to the base of the skull, and a normal internal carotid artery (ICA) segment was found before entering the carotid canal. The distal end of the extracranial ICA was exposed by transecting the digastric muscle and removing the styloid process during the procedures.
        • Full-Text
        • PDF
        Open Access

      Comments

      Commenting Guidelines

      To submit a comment for a journal article, please use the space above and note the following:

      • We will review submitted comments as soon as possible, striving for within two business days.
      • This forum is intended for constructive dialogue. Comments that are commercial or promotional in nature, pertain to specific medical cases, are not relevant to the article for which they have been submitted, or are otherwise inappropriate will not be posted.
      • We require that commenters identify themselves with names and affiliations.
      • Comments must be in compliance with our Terms & Conditions.
      • Comments are not peer-reviewed.