Advertisement
Coup D'Oeil| Volume 54, ISSUE 1, P11, July 2017

Surgical Treatment of Splenic Artery Aneurysm

  • P. Berek
    Affiliations
    Clinic of Vascular Surgery, East Slovak Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (VÚSCH, a.s.), Košice, Slovak Republic

    Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Košice, Slovak Republic
    Search for articles by this author
  • P. Štefanič
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author. Clinic of Vascular Surgery, East Slovak Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (VÚSCH, a.s.), Ondavská 8, Košice, 040 01, Slovak Republic.
    Affiliations
    Clinic of Vascular Surgery, East Slovak Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (VÚSCH, a.s.), Košice, Slovak Republic

    Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Košice, Slovak Republic
    Search for articles by this author
Open ArchivePublished:March 18, 2017DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.02.019
      A 73 year old patient was admitted with back pain in the thoracic and lumbar area; CT angiography revealed a 60×70 mm saccular splenic artery aneurysm (SAA) (panel A). The symptomatic SAA was repaired via a left subcostal incision, with end to end splenic artery reconstruction precluding the need for great saphenous vein or prosthetic graft interposition (panel B, hollow black arrow = anastomosis, yellow arrows = margins of the open SAA sac). The patient was discharged home 8 days after the operation in a clinically stable condition and with relief of his back pain.

      Comments

      Commenting Guidelines

      To submit a comment for a journal article, please use the space above and note the following:

      • We will review submitted comments as soon as possible, striving for within two business days.
      • This forum is intended for constructive dialogue. Comments that are commercial or promotional in nature, pertain to specific medical cases, are not relevant to the article for which they have been submitted, or are otherwise inappropriate will not be posted.
      • We require that commenters identify themselves with names and affiliations.
      • Comments must be in compliance with our Terms & Conditions.
      • Comments are not peer-reviewed.