Advertisement
Coup D'Oeil| Volume 54, ISSUE 1, P27, July 2017

A Retrograde Endo-bypass to Revascularise an Isolated Internal Iliac Artery

  • E. Girsowicz
    Affiliations
    Department of Vascular Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Les Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
    Search for articles by this author
  • N. Chakfé
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author. Department of Vascular Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Les Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, B.P. 426, 67091 Strasbourg, France.
    Affiliations
    Department of Vascular Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Les Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
    Search for articles by this author
Open ArchivePublished:March 18, 2017DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.02.020
      An 83 year old man presented with severe left buttock claudication 2 months after treatment of an abdominal aortic atherosclerotic ulcer with an aorto-uni-iliac endoprosthesis, a left common iliac occluder and a right to left femoro-femoral crossover bypass. Computed tomography angiography showed an occluded left external iliac artery (LEIA) with an underfilled left internal iliac artery (LIIA). Via open femoral access, subintimal recanalisation of the LEIA was performed, followed by placement of two 7 × 150 mm VIABAHN® endoprostheses (WL Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZ, USA), resulting in successful retrograde inflow to the LIIA and complete recovery of the patient's symptoms.

      Comments

      Commenting Guidelines

      To submit a comment for a journal article, please use the space above and note the following:

      • We will review submitted comments as soon as possible, striving for within two business days.
      • This forum is intended for constructive dialogue. Comments that are commercial or promotional in nature, pertain to specific medical cases, are not relevant to the article for which they have been submitted, or are otherwise inappropriate will not be posted.
      • We require that commenters identify themselves with names and affiliations.
      • Comments must be in compliance with our Terms & Conditions.
      • Comments are not peer-reviewed.