Advertisement
Coup D'Oeil| Volume 54, ISSUE 1, P49, July 2017

Bilateral Common Femoral Vein Aneurysms Responsible for Massive Pulmonary Embolism

  • A. Lejay
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author. Department of Vascular Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, BP 426, 67091 Strasbourg Cedex, France.
    Affiliations
    Department of Vascular Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, University Hospital of Strasbourg, France
    Search for articles by this author
  • N. Chakfé
    Affiliations
    Department of Vascular Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, University Hospital of Strasbourg, France
    Search for articles by this author
Open ArchivePublished:March 19, 2017DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.02.021
      A 55 year old man presented with bilateral groin masses observed when standing, but which disappeared when lying down. Computed tomography angiography, confirmed by Duplex ultrasound, demonstrated two large common femoral vein aneurysms (CFVA) without great saphenous vein varicosities. The right CFVA was treated first by open tangential resection and lateral venorrhaphy. The next day, the patient developed massive pulmonary embolism despite therapeutic anticoagulation. Caval filter placement and left CFVA venorrhaphy were performed with open pulmonary embolectomy under extracorporeal circulatory bypass. Residual thrombus was found in left CFVA that might account for pulmonary embolism. The post-operative course was uneventful afterwards.

      Comments

      Commenting Guidelines

      To submit a comment for a journal article, please use the space above and note the following:

      • We will review submitted comments as soon as possible, striving for within two business days.
      • This forum is intended for constructive dialogue. Comments that are commercial or promotional in nature, pertain to specific medical cases, are not relevant to the article for which they have been submitted, or are otherwise inappropriate will not be posted.
      • We require that commenters identify themselves with names and affiliations.
      • Comments must be in compliance with our Terms & Conditions.
      • Comments are not peer-reviewed.