Advertisement
Invited Commentary| Volume 62, ISSUE 1, P54, July 2021

Small Aneurysm Surveillance Over 80: Is it Worthwhile?

  • Aminder A. Singh
    Affiliations
    Cambridge Vascular Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust & Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
    Search for articles by this author
  • Jonathan R. Boyle
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author. Cambridge Vascular Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust & Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
    Affiliations
    Cambridge Vascular Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust & Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
    Search for articles by this author
Open ArchivePublished:April 22, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.03.018
      Vega de Ceniga et al.
      • Vega de Ceniga M.
      • Larizgoitia J.B.
      • Vélez A.B.
      • Fernández A.G.
      • Laliena L.E.
      Outcomes of small incidental abdominal aortic aneurysms in octogenarian and nonagenarian patients in Northern Spain.
      conducted a retrospective cohort study of 310 patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) aged over 80 years. The authors concluded that the risk of late rupture in octogenarian and nonagenarian patients is small and conservative management without follow up and repair seems reasonable for most of these patients. This was a large population that was contemporaneously followed up (follow up index 0.997).
      This study raises some interesting questions in an area where the evidence base is limited. Of those who had AAA diameters of 55 mm, reaching the threshold for intervention, > 90% were managed conservatively owing to significant comorbidity precluding endovascular or open repair, and the vast majority succumbed to causes of death unrelated to their AAA. This finding alone questions the role surveillance in this age group. As life expectancy increases, how do we adjust services to be cost effective but not limit therapeutic intervention on the basis of age alone? Contemporary evidence suggests that not offering AAA surveillance to those aged > 85 years with an AAA diameter < 40 mm is a justified approach.
      • Elbasty A.
      • Nickinson A.T.O.
      • Delaney C.
      • Stather P.W.
      • Burrows M.
      • Delbridge M.
      • et al.
      Outcomes of sub-threshold abdominal aortic aneurysms undergoing surveillance in patients aged 85 years or over.
      Certainly, based on the findings in this study, an earlier determination of fitness for surgery should be made to prevent unnecessary surveillance of patients who are unlikely ever to be candidates for intervention. Ideally, such a decision should be made after multidisciplinary team review and discussion with patient and family. Age alone should not be a single determinant for offering or declining intervention, but it should prompt a dialogue about what is in the patient’s best interests.
      AAA guidelines published by the European Society of Vascular Surgery recommend that AAA intervention should not be offered to those with life expectancy < 2 years.
      • Wanhainen A.
      • Verzini F.
      • Van Herzeele I.
      • Allaire E.
      • Bown M.
      • Cohnert T.
      • et al.
      European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2019 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Abdominal Aorto-iliac Artery Aneurysms.
      This study supports this by demonstrating life expectancy, irrespective of comorbidity, at two and five years was 71% and 38%, respectively. One of the strengths of this study was that it included all patients, including those managed conservatively, which may explain the worse survival figures observed compared with data for selected octogenarians undergoing AAA intervention from the Swedish Vascular Registry.
      • Mani K.
      • Björck M.
      • Lundkvist J.
      • Wanhainen A.
      Improved long-term survival after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
      We know that rupture rates for small AAAs, certainly those < 40 mm, are ‘very low’ indeed, late rupture in this cohort is extremely rare.
      • Oliver-Williams C.
      • Sweeting M.J.
      • Jacomelli J.
      • Summers L.
      • Stevenson A.
      • Lees T.
      • et al.
      Safety of men with small and medium abdominal aortic aneurysms under surveillance in the NAAASP.
      There is certainly an increasingly strong argument against surveillance of small AAAs in the very elderly, and in an era of providing more cost effective care it seems sensible to take this approach. A small minority (5.5%) in this study suffered AAA rupture with a median diameter of 68 mm (interquartile range 50 – 79 mm). Survival in the few that had intervention was poor (n = 1/4; 25%). However, an inherent issue with retrospective studies is that cause of death cannot be defined confidently for all patients who die in the community. We cannot be certain that those with significant comorbidity, such as advanced dementia, did not suffer an AAA rupture related death. In ideal circumstances, all study participants would undergo autopsy.
      In conclusion, appropriate patient selection for AAA surveillance and intervention remains paramount. This important study suggests that we should reconsider our approach to surveillance in octogenarians and nonagenarians and identify those that should not be offered intervention early and cease surveillance.

      References

        • Vega de Ceniga M.
        • Larizgoitia J.B.
        • Vélez A.B.
        • Fernández A.G.
        • Laliena L.E.
        Outcomes of small incidental abdominal aortic aneurysms in octogenarian and nonagenarian patients in Northern Spain.
        Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021; 62: 46-53
        • Elbasty A.
        • Nickinson A.T.O.
        • Delaney C.
        • Stather P.W.
        • Burrows M.
        • Delbridge M.
        • et al.
        Outcomes of sub-threshold abdominal aortic aneurysms undergoing surveillance in patients aged 85 years or over.
        Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019; 58: 357-361
        • Wanhainen A.
        • Verzini F.
        • Van Herzeele I.
        • Allaire E.
        • Bown M.
        • Cohnert T.
        • et al.
        European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2019 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Abdominal Aorto-iliac Artery Aneurysms.
        Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019; 57: 8-93
        • Mani K.
        • Björck M.
        • Lundkvist J.
        • Wanhainen A.
        Improved long-term survival after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
        Circulation. 2009; 120: 201-211
        • Oliver-Williams C.
        • Sweeting M.J.
        • Jacomelli J.
        • Summers L.
        • Stevenson A.
        • Lees T.
        • et al.
        Safety of men with small and medium abdominal aortic aneurysms under surveillance in the NAAASP.
        Circulation. 2019; 139: 1371-1380

      Linked Article

      Comments

      Commenting Guidelines

      To submit a comment for a journal article, please use the space above and note the following:

      • We will review submitted comments as soon as possible, striving for within two business days.
      • This forum is intended for constructive dialogue. Comments that are commercial or promotional in nature, pertain to specific medical cases, are not relevant to the article for which they have been submitted, or are otherwise inappropriate will not be posted.
      • We require that commenters identify themselves with names and affiliations.
      • Comments must be in compliance with our Terms & Conditions.
      • Comments are not peer-reviewed.