This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular SurgeryAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
Article info
Publication history
Accepted:
January 12,
2023
Received in revised form:
December 21,
2022
Received:
November 21,
2022
Publication stage
In Press Accepted ManuscriptIdentification
Copyright
Crown Copyright © 2023 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Society for Vascular Surgery. All rights reserved.
ScienceDirect
Access this article on ScienceDirectLinked Article
- Are We Over Treating Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms?European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular SurgeryVol. 64Issue 6
- PreviewElective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair is a prophylactic intervention to prevent AAA rupture. The development of modern surgical treatment of AAA began with the first reports of open aneurysm repair (OAR) with homografts in the early 1950s. Although it was recognised early that AAA diameter was directly correlated with rupture risk (RR), it was not until the 1970s when the first reports came suggesting that an aneurysm diameter above five cm seemed to be the pivot point for this risk. These data were primarily based on small case series and autopsy reports from pioneers, and, in the decades that followed, it remained debated what the optimal size threshold for AAA repair actually was.
- Full-Text
- Preview
