After publication of the original article, the author noticed some errors to the article which are included in this erratum.
The short title should read: Systematic Review: Pre-clinical In Vitro Models for Vascular Graft Coating and Infection.
The titles for Tables 1, 2 and 3 and Figure 1 should read:
Table 1. Vascular grafts and coating in pre-clinical in vitro models for vascular graft coating and infection
Table 2. Antibiotic coatings and tested bacterial strains in pre-clinical in vitro models for vascular graft coating and infection
Table 3. Non-antibiotic coatings and bacterial strains in pre-clinical in vitro models for vascular graft coating and infection.
Figure 1: Preferred reporting items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram of studies reporting pre-clinical in vitro models for vascular graft coating and infection.
Article info
Publication history
Published online: February 15, 2023
Publication stage
In Press Corrected ProofIdentification
Copyright
© 2023 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
ScienceDirect
Access this article on ScienceDirectLinked Article
- Pre-clinical In Vitro Models of Vascular Graft Coating in the Prevention of Vascular Graft Infection: A Systematic ReviewEuropean Journal of Vascular and Endovascular SurgeryVol. 63Issue 1
- PreviewVascular graft infection (VGI) is a feared complication. Prevention is of the utmost importance and vascular graft coatings (VGCs) could offer a potential to do this, with in vitro research a first crucial step. The aim of this study was to summarise key features of in vitro models investigating coating strategies to prevent VGI in order to provide guidance for the setup of future translational research.
- Full-Text
- Preview
Related Articles
Comments
Commenting Guidelines
To submit a comment for a journal article, please use the space above and note the following:
- We will review submitted comments as soon as possible, striving for within two business days.
- This forum is intended for constructive dialogue. Comments that are commercial or promotional in nature, pertain to specific medical cases, are not relevant to the article for which they have been submitted, or are otherwise inappropriate will not be posted.
- We require that commenters identify themselves with names and affiliations.
- Comments must be in compliance with our Terms & Conditions.
- Comments are not peer-reviewed.