x
Filter:
Filters applied
- Editor
- Review ArticleRemove Review Article filter
- Carotid endarterectomyRemove Carotid endarterectomy filter
- StrokeRemove Stroke filter
Editor's Choice Articles
1 Results
- ReviewOpen Archive
Editor's Choice – An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Outcomes Following Eversion vs. Conventional Carotid Endarterectomy in Randomised Controlled Trials and Observational Studies
European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular SurgeryVol. 55Issue 4p465–473Published online: February 6, 2018- Kosmas I. Paraskevas
- Vaux Robertson
- Athanasios N. Saratzis
- A. Ross Naylor
Cited in Scopus: 38A 2011 meta-analysis comparing eversion (eCEA) with conventional (cCEA) carotid endarterectomy in 16,251 patients concluded that eCEA was associated with lower rates of peri-operative stroke and late occlusion compared with cCEA. However, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) showed no difference in outcomes. Since then, the literature contains outcome data on 49,500 patients undergoing eCEA or cCEA. An updated meta-analysis was performed to establish whether eCEA confers significant benefit over cCEA.